Thursday, March 26, 2015

List of things about myself

1.     You think I like to draw.

2.     I actually don’t like to draw; neither do I often draw. It’s strange how a large portion of the population here sees me as the ‘girl that draws’ when I don’t make three complete drawings a semester. I know I used to like drawing. I used to use up 20 pieces of paper a day and draw with concentration and vigor I never woke except for this activity in trying to endow life to whatever being sprang out of the tip of my pen. I liked it because it was simple and fun, and because I enjoyed the feeling of the moments it worked out well—as if the drawing created the rest of itself on its own.
I got older. I started caring about getting the biological structures of people realistically correct. 99 percent of the subjects of my drawings being people, I had to care a lot. I got tired. From some point on in middle school, I never could finish a drawing I started. I would begin on a piece of paper excitedly but then lose the force to see the end of it. I grew more tired, and no longer could derive much fun from the activity.
Now I am in pretty much the same state, but I have discovered a way of caring less. It is starting from a single meaningless, shapeless blob or a stroke. Imagining heads and limbs onto random blobs and out of random strokes and evolving them out is fun. I don’t have to structure and figure—I just have to see weird things in random places, and I do that well.

3.     I’ve never been quite able to keep my hands still while listening to or watching things (like class or TV). I doodled in the margins of textbooks and the back few pages of notebooks all through middle and elementary school, played with eraser shavings until they turned claylike, carve little holes into wooden desks with pencils and tried to fill it with the ink from gel-pens, and created very detailed small fake scars on my hand with pen and glue. I somehow stopped doing all these things, but I have one habit remaining. I like to create rows of regularly spaced tiny rips the edges of a piece of paper.

4.     I am extremely, extremely slow. I will never do anything on time. Like this here. I write in 2 thirds the speed of most other kids, walk in half, study in a fourth, and talk in slow motion. Freshmen year, I think I got 30 penalty points just for being late. I was once at court for being late for school 6 times, although not all in one week. I always come to classes in the English building the latest.
When I do work and schoolwork, like making a page for a month to be in the school calendar or writing an essay, I am always the latest to submit. I procrastinate, too, but it is more that I am slow in the process. I think the problem is in that assign much more work to myself than other kids do; I plan too extravagantly and never finish in time. Slowness is seriously a killing attribute in school. But it’s okay. I’ve survived.

5.     I like to write. I always found myself enjoying the process of writing for all the various writing assignments given here; although I suspend beginning till the very last moment, I like it when I finally do. However, I’ve recently discovered I also like writing random things at random times for my eyes and my pleasure only. It could range from a word to a few sentences to a whole story.

6.     I like to write in Korean better than in English because it feels to me, ‘dry’. I noticed in the days of my first encounters with full sentences in English that it sounds and looks much more ‘wet’ in speech and on paper. None of native English speakers I’ve tried explaining this to understood what I meant, but all of the native Korean speakers did. I can’t quite pin it, but I suppose it has to do with how the tongue and teeth work and how the letters are shaped.

7.     I cry very frequently. I don’t think it’s that I cry on a small doses of sadness, but that I get very sad very frequently. That sounds sad, but I’ve grown quite used to it. But I’m trying to get out of it because the people that I like don’t like me sad.

8.     I sporadically get obsessed with recycling and picking up trash on the street. I think when we all learned in kindergarten that picking up trash is a thing that very nice people do, it stuck to my unconsciousness like tree sap and afterwards, even when it fell off, it left some stickiness there and makes me act that way.

9.     I like violent images. I draw ghosts, Death, bloody girls, and hurt. I recently found I write about them, too. The most recent thing I wrote for fun is a passage in the stream of consciousness of a girl in the moment of death by car accident.



10.   I love the world outside—I think this characteristic started to develop during my days in Canada, most of which I spent climbing trees, flying leaves, digging an irrigation system by a pool, concocting perfume out of roses outside my house, and etc. I came here and started to take photos, and so learned how not only fun but also beautiful nature is. I like staring at things. I like sitting amongst and under trees. I like acquainting flowers.

11.   I love the smell of approaching winter. Frigidity, at least so far as I have perceived, very literally possesses a unique scent. Around November each year, I step out one day to find that this fragrance has hung itself slightly in the air. The sweet surprise and melancholy is one of the fairest sensations I encounter ever every year. I suddenly feel as if I have been painted brutally white with a very large and mildly bristly brush. I love standing face covered and stiffened with paint, but with a mind hallowed in the sudden striking sense.



12.   I love snow. The first snowfall every year is a huge event for me. But since last winter, I lost a bit of interest in snow. I think it’s because it’s too cold here. I found myself longing for summer the first time in my remembered life last year. It seems to be settling in as a pattern, because I am feeling so again this year.



13.   I hate homophobic people. I can’t really frame why, but whenever someone saying hateful things about homosexuals catches my ears, I feel disgusted and disappointed.

14.   I don’t have a religion. I believe some God exists somewhere in the universe (or out of it) and controls some things, but I don’t believe in the Christian God or that of any other religion. I used to be thoughtlessly Christian until one Monday morning in 2nd grade. I was going to a Christian private school, and we had service-assemblies every Monday morning. Like any other week, we were singing new hymns. Then in one hymn, a line of the lyrics said, “it doesn’t matter if you’re a bad person or a nice person; if you believe you will go to heaven!” I realized something was wrong with this religion. So I started being skeptical.

15.   I’d thought in middle school that if I were to take up a religion, in would be Zoroastrianism because I liked the idea of the coexistence and unity of the good and the evil and how they could not be separated; that they were in fact in the same thing. Now I don’t care.

16.   I believe extra-terrestrial beings must exist, just because the universe is big enough.

17.   I often am very tired. I don’t find much joy in any activity, because the things I planned with joy I never can complete and therefore just tire me out more. After coming to KMLA, I am always sleep deprived, and this does not add positive to my mental tiredness. I was really depressed for a while thinking life is a series of patterns repeated and the only state you become at the end of each cycle is more tired, but I decided that thought was as meaningless and tiring and so of no help at all. I asked a lot of people why they live and concluded that people live because they’re already living. Why shouldn’t I?


18.   I used to have a couple of very suicidal, negative, and depressed friends. They both got better, then one regressed. It’s draining and heartbreaking to keep telling someone you care for that they shouldn’t die and to shake in fear of losing him or her the whole while. But it helps, too, because it forces me to be extra positive. I really wish the people I care for would be happy, though.

19.   I like skin transparent enough for blue veins to show through, long eyelashes, and bright eyes curtained in dark. Unfortunately, I’ve never met anyone with all three characteristics at once.

20.   Sometimes I get uncontrollable episodes of mouth-hunger where I have to immediately eat everything I see (that, of course, is mine to eat) the moment I see it. It’s not that I am stomach-hungry, but that I get a burning desire to bite and chew and taste. I don’t like it.

21.   I respect Hyun-A of 4minute. She makes herself different. She becomes a whole different person on stage, wears a new face, and moves herself like she’s not from this world. It’s really an eerie experience to observe videos of her dancing with the other members of the group or with back dancers; the disparity freaks me out. If you watch a video of 4minute, you should instantly be able to see that she moves differently from the rest of the members though at least 3 of them are reasonably good dancers.

22.   One day in 5th grade or something, I was thinking about dimensions. The 0th dimension is a dot. 1st: line, 2nd: plane, 3rd: sphere, 4th: time. What could be the fifth? Then I realized a sphere is like a dot. And time is a line of those spheres. So the 5th dimension should be a plane of lines of time. There must exist parallel lines of time. Alternate histories of our universe. The 6th dimension would be a collection of different planes of lines of times of a universe. So each plane would be a different universe. I still haven’t imagined what the 7th dimension would be like.
Later I learned many other people had hypothesized about parallel universes, too.

23.   So my theory is that ‘deja-vu’s are glimpses into our parallel lines of time. When we experience something that the ‘we’ in another line of history near to ours have experienced already, we form for a moment a connection to that near line and get the feeling that we’ve seen and done this before.
I get ‘deja-vu’s so frequently I needed a theory.

24.   I hate arguing or fighting (except like when logically discussing a non-personal issue). I always bend in rather than strike up an argument. I have been mostly obedient to my parents and teachers, but now I’m learning that I can’t live like that forever.


25.   I normally can’t care enough to hate somebody for an extended period of time, but I absolutely hate some of the teachers here.

26. I really like milk, too. And now I'm living beside a milk factory. It's like a dream come true.

27. I want to live one day in a white house with a garden that blooms full of white flowers all year around.

Sunday, July 7, 2013

MInjok and the 21st Century: and Me in KMLA




I had never really thought about the term 'minjok' much before.



            

To be honest, I hadn't even thoroughly contemplated the idea even when preparing for the admission interviews for KMLA (Korean Minjok Leadership Academy; I obviously should have).  Come to think of it, it was up to a rather strange level that I so unconditionally accepted the term and its general meaning: the population of a nation with relations much like famil(民族, composed of 'min', subjects or citizens, and 'jok', meaning kin and the same character used in 家族, 가족, family). How could a whole country filled with persons and personas of all different shapes, sizes and color be considered to have one common identity as a family? And how could I not have thought that over once? Questions rose immediately upon the first touch I made of the topic.


What is 'minjok'? 
The Australian Research Council linkage project on Languages of Security in the Asia Pacific has an interesting article on the word 'minjok', how the idea evolved, and its underlying concepts. 

Well, the first sentence freaked me out. 


"The concept of ‘nation’ (민족 (民族) minjok) is new in Korean. The term was first used only around 1905 and is a loanword from the Japanese word ‘minzoku’."




Gasp.

So this word 'minjok', the word we (yes, we) most often use to describe our (yes, our) culture, our history, our race, our nation, our ethnicity and our country's people is actually recent and, in fact, Japanese. Double gasp. We hate the Japanese!

What

HAPPENED
H E R E




POINT ONE

WAY BACK IN HISTORY


I, presumably like most of the 'minjok' of Korea, thought the idea of minjok was a cultural heritage of Korea; that it may be outdated and nationalistic because it really was
well,
old.
When I thought of minjok, I thought of this:





We are a race that are 5000 years old! We have lived on the Korean Peninsula for half a 10-thousand years now! Dangun fathered all of us! We have tradition! Look at all the wonderful things from Chosun Dynasty! Such pretty colors in Danchung: they are traditional! Hanbok is the best clothing in the world! From Ancient Chosun to ROK, we have built up thousands of years of history that all of us minjok share!
No.
Who are 'we' anyway: why that's such a silly question! Of course we are the Han minjok, the descendants of Dangun and the sole main population of the Korean Peninsula throughout history!
Yes, WE ARE MINJOK
No.
I'd thought Koreans shared a history; a history in which we'd always stuck to each other and held in ourselves that we were all Korean. We'd always been a minjok, proud to keep borders closed and invasions out. We'd always thought of ourselves as one minjok that shared everything to do with ethnicity and nationallity.
No.


POINT TWO


IT TURNED OUT; NO




So, no.
As it turned out, that was not what really happened. The idea had formed in around 1905, as a means of emotional background for retalliation against the Japanese and colonization, and their idea of unifying the world. Korea was not the same as Japan, was not part of it, and would not be part of the Greater East Asia Co-prosperity Sphere. Korea was on its own. This seems like a very positive start for minjok. We were forming an identity.
People constantly struggle to build self-identity. Countries, I think, do as well. But Korea hadn't been exposed enough to wake up and start forming an identity called Korea. It had its borders closed, and it didn't have anything much to differentiate itself from. Japanese invasion happened. Koreans were endangered. The people were there, but were they Japanese? Were they Korean?
So they became MINJOK.
Then things turned downhill. People were being united as minjok for a different purpose. They were one, and they were subject to one. The military regime took over Korea, and called the people minjok. This minjok needed to unite! It was poor, and it was devastated, according to the head.


They actually needed to go back in under Japan.




POINT THREE
NOW?


SO NOW WHERE ARE WE? WHAT ARE WE HEADING TOWARDS?
Shin Gi Wook of Stanford University is quite an expert on the matter. He has spent a lot of   his life invested in studying minjok, and one of the results is this: The Paradox of Korean Globalization.
Here, he talks about how Korea is in the trend recently (2003) of heading for globalization, but how nationalism is all the more getting stronger. This is a paradox, but one that will happen.
Ten years from then, Korea has become much more globalized, but the basic logic of 2003 still works. I personally believe that the more influx of foreign material and culture flows in, the stronger Koreans will bind under the term 'minjok'.
In the past, 'minjok' was not for big foreign identities were not.
Big foreign identities emerged, and finally colonized this scattered population of the Korean Peninsula. 'Minjok' appeared.
More big foreign identities emerged, and Korea needed their help. Particular people in Korea needed their help as well. 'Minjok' was strengthened.
Now Korea has become the big foreign identity. It is striding out onto the globe, and it needs an idea to hold the people of the big identity together.
Is 'minjok' appropriate?
See, the problems with 'minjok' are that it is highly exclusive. Korea has this weird idea that we are all of one race, and one race only. This is what 'minjok' means essentially. 
And this family gets angry. 
"We are all one big angry family! We are angry at Japan! We are angry at strange dark skinned people trying to sneak into our family! We are angry at white men stealing our women! We are proud to be a family that rose out of the most terrible economic state imaginable into a good, proud, affluent nation! We are morning calm and we are angry! We are angry at you! Neuuahahaaaaaah!"

 shoo.




But somehow this family has an occupation in markets and really likes dining out. 





What?


No, it will not work.
The idea of minjok we have today?
The idea of minjok KMLA supports today?






is closer to a failing religion.  

Monday, June 24, 2013

Yum. (Response to "You're not fluffy, just morbidly obese" by Hyesung Roh)




Response to "You're not fluffy, just morbidly obese" by Hyesung Roh



Mr. Thread
I am simply abashed
When I came over for brunch
You did not taste sweet
or chewy
or morbidly toothsome
What I meant to say was,  you taste..
always as if you're about to point out
that I am, yes I am, in fact
healthy and – and full
Yes, thats what you tell me every bite I take

Thank you for being all of your eight cherry pies. That look on your face, and I can't stop.










Tuesday, June 4, 2013

Monthly TOEFL Essay #2: Minority rules (unabridged version)










IN THE TWENTY FIRST CENTURY,
THE GENDER MINORITY GROUPS
WILL RISE TO BE THE MAJORITY GROUPS


This century will bring a particular sort of social change: one where the world turns over placing minority groups of long history at the top of society. Who are these minority? Two groups have evidently begun the march up to this metamorphosis. One is half of the whole population treated not even human for so long; the other is a much smaller group whose gender identity differs from their biological sex. They are going to rule the world. 


Ladies first. Women's rights are improving: that has been the trend for the last several decades. Changes have been consistently elevating the status of women even since the 21st century began. Ever heard of the term 'alpha girl'? It was sort of a fad a few years ago in the beginning of this century. It indicated a girl or a woman who excelled in activities beyond any man. It indicated a girl or a woman was generally expected to be inferior to males, but there were a few exceptions so exceptional they deserve a whole nice cute phrase to themselves. That's what people thought at the time.  
That phrase quietly crept into the shadows. There are no 'alpha girl's. Every girl is exceptional, and no girl is expected to be naturally inferior to men. Now, people acknowledge that females should no longer be considered any different than men, though action doesn't always follow. People don't believe in 'alpha girl's anymore: they believe in 'alpha people'. Or at least they know they should. That's how we are now equal. There were fights, there was media, there were individual alpha girls, there were stupid men, and there were brave women. There was 'equal'.  
But will it stop there? Men used to be the ruling species; they weren't equal, they were over women. They were at the top of societies, and they controlled. They were the only gender that ruled. The only. So won't women become the only ones to rule as well? They say the qualities required for this century are those of the feminine sort; empathy, sensitivity, carrying out tasks in a detailed manner, knowing how to be subtle. Of course, not all women possess these qualities and not all men don't, but generally speaking, this is what society thinks women have. This is what higher jobs of the new era require, them being more about investment, management, and social relationships. At least, that's what people have started thinking. Among 64,000 people surveyed in thirteen nations, two thirds feel the world would be a better place if men thought more like women. Women are wanted. They will be placed on the top, soon. Or else, they'll make they're own way there. 


Then we have homosexuals. As was just mentioned, feminine qualities are desired in society today. Now, there are gay men who have these feminine qualities. These are the rulers coming after women in the 21C social hierarchy. There is more to this story. Besides women-like traits, there is another thing the society currently needs. Less people. The Earth is overflowing with people. It's gross. People are using up everything. However, it seems like people aren't going to change their style of living for at least quite some time. 
So what can be changed? The number of the pests on the planet. Evolution will happen. There are too many people. Too many people breed. There need to be less people who breed. Homosexuals don't really breed. Or they can perfectly control it. They are what Earth wants more of instead of these destructive heterosexuals. More and more people will gain the mutation. Eventually, the human kind will evolve towards being homosexuals.  
Now you whine, "But our species can't survive if we don't breed!" No, we can survive fine. Why is it homosexuals and not infertile people? Humans have rather amazingly developed technology to the point where no actual breeding is required to give birth to offspring. So if we are mostly homosexuals, then we can control birth rates. I think nature knows that. Gay people are the next step in evolution. That's why so many homosexuals are what is currently viewed by people as 'awesome'. These 'awesome' people will jump up hoppidy hop, up to the top. Then they will ameliorate policies, and even more homosexuals will rule our world.


Women will be the ruling gender of our world, and then gay people will be. It does seem a little radical for the current century. But think about what happened in the previous one. People went from being unable to communicate at distances more that ten meters away to seeing each others faces live while on opposite sides of the Earth. Technology turned over.  Society will. 


Monday, June 3, 2013

Monthly TOEFL Essay #2: Minority rules









IN THE TWENTY FIRST CENTURY,
THE GENDER MINORITY GROUPS
WILL RISE TO BE THE MAJORITY GROUPS


This century will bring a particular sort of social change: one where the world turns over placing minority groups of long history at the top of society. Who are these minority? Two groups have evidently begun the march up to this metamorphosis. One is half of the whole population treated not even human for so long; the other is a much smaller group whose gender identities are peculier. They will rule the world. 


Ladies first. Ever heard of the term 'alpha girl'? It was sort of a fad a few years ago. It indicated a girl or a woman who excelled in activities beyond a man. It indicated a girl or a woman was generally expected to be inferior to males, but there were a few exceptions so exceptional they deserved a whole nice cute phrase to themselves.
That phrase quietly crept into the shadows. People don't believe in 'alpha girl's anymore. Every girl is exceptional, and no girl is expected to be naturally inferior to men. Or at least people know that that should be the case. There is 'equal'.  
But will it stop there? Men used to be the ruling species; they weren't 'equal', they were the only gender that ruled. So can't women gain that position? The qualities required for this century are those of the feminine sort; empathy, sensitivity, detailed manner, being subtle. It is what higher jobs of the new era require, them being more about investment, management, and social relationships. Of course, not all women possess these qualities and not all men don't, but generally speaking, this is what society thinks women have. At least, that's what people have started to think. Among 64,000 people surveyed in thirteen nations, two thirds feel the world would be a better place if men thought more like women. Women are wanted. They will be placed on the top, soon. Or else, they'll make they're own way there. 


Then we have homosexuals. As was just mentioned, feminine qualities are desired in society today. Now, there are gay men who have these qualities. These are the rulers to come after women. There is more to this story for besides women-like traits, there is another thing the society currently needs. Less people. Earth is overflowing. Humans are using up everything. However, it seems like people aren't going to change their lifestyles for quite some time. 
So what can be changed? The number of the pests on the planet. There need to be less people who breed. Homosexuals don't. They're what Earth wants more of instead of destructive heterosexuals. Evolution. More and more people will be born with the mutation. Eventually, mankind will evolve towards being homosexuals.  
Now some may whine, "But our species can't survive if we don't breed!" No, we can survive fine. Why is it homosexuals and not infertile people? Humans have developed technology to the awe-striking point where no actual breeding is required to create offspring if there's the material. So if we are mostly homosexuals, we can control birth rates. Nature knows that. 
Gay people are the next step in evolution. That's why so many homosexuals are what is currently viewed by people as 'awesome'. These 'awesome' people will jump up to the top. Then they will ameliorate policies, and even more homosexuals will rule our world.


Women will be the ruling gender of our world, and then gay people will be. It does seem a little radical for the current century. But think about what happened in the previous one. People went from being unable to communicate at distances more than a hundred meters away to seeing each others faces live while on opposite sides of the Earth. Technology turned over.  Society will, too.



Monthly TOEFL Outline #2: Minority rules







IN THE TWENTY FIRST CENTURY,
THE GENDER MINORITY GROUPS
WILL RISE TO BE THE MAJORITY GROUPS


Weird. Right? The major change I think this century will bring is a particular sort of social change: where the world turns over placing long long minority groups at the top of society. Who are these minority? I saw two evident groups that were marching right up to this metamorphosis. One is the gender-wise minority group; the other is really young people. They are going to rule the world. I think. Why oh why would I possibly think this?







WOMEN AND HOMOSEXUALS





  1. Women's rights are improving: that has been the trend for the last several decades

  • Everyone's heard of this. We all know that women were treated really bad and then they started being treated as humans, became enfranchised, and are now looked upon as equal to men by most people.
  • So now women are equal. 
  • But not so far in the 21st century, women aren't going to stop there. They will rise and become socially what men used to be in the past for hundreds of years; the lone dominant race of the planet for the most part. 
  • I know it sounds radical, but it is not unlikely. 
  • Ever heard of the term 'alpha girl'? It was sort of a fad a few years ago in the very beginning of the 21st century. It indicated a girl or a woman who could do multiple things at once, or one who excelled in activities beyond any man. It indicated a girl or a woman was generally expected to be inferior to males, but there were a few exceptions so exceptional they deserve a whole nice cute phrase to themselves. That's what people thought at the time. That's what women actually were at the time: it's only very recent so many females started getting out of the household more.
  • That phrase disappeared. There are no 'alpha girl's. Every girl is exceptional, and no girl is expected to be naturally inferior to men. Even back then, women were thought to be 'equals', but that wasn't in the whole spirit of the word. Now people acknowledge that females should no longer be considered any different than men, though action doesn't always follow. People don't believe in 'alpha girl's anymore: they believe in 'alpha people'. Or at least they know they should. 
  • That's how we are now equal. There were fights, there was media, there were individual alpha girls, there were stupid men, and there were brave women. There was 'equal'. 
  • But will it stop there? 
  • Men used to be the ruling species; they weren't equal, they were over women. They were at the top of societies, and they controlled. They were the only gender that ruled. The only. 
  • So won't women become the only ones to rule as well? 
  • They say the qualities required for this century are those of the feminine sort; empathy, sensitivity, carrying out tasks in a detailed manner, knowing how to subtle. Of course, not all women possess these qualities and not all men don't, but generally speaking, this is what society thinks 'feminine'. This is what higher jobs of the new era require, them being more about investment, management, and social relationships. Even if it isn't, that's what people have started thinking. Among 64,000 people surveyed in thirteen nations, two thirds feel the world would be a better place if men thought more like women. Women are wanted. They will be placed on the top, soon.


     2.  And then we have the homosexuals

  • Feminine qualities are wanted, right? 
  • Now we have gay men who have those feminine qualities. These are the next rulers in the 21C social hierarchy. 
  • Now, there is another thing the society currently needs. That is less people. The Earth is overflowing with people. It's gross. People are using up everything. We all know about environmental issues, don't we? And guess what: it seems like people aren't going to change their style of living for at least quite some time. So what else can be changed? The number of the pests on the planet. 
  • There's this thing called 'evolution'. Although some people don't believe in 'big evolution', like from a frog to an elephant, most believe in at least 'small evolution', like from an early form of humans to what we are now. I hope you do to. Because what I'm about to suggest here is a rather radical form of small evolution. 
  • There are too many people. Too many people breed. There needs to be less people who breed. Homosexuals don't really breed. Or they can perfectly control it. They are what Earth wants more of instead of these destructive heterosexuals. More and more people will gain the mutation. Eventually, the human kind will evolve towards being homosexuals. 
  • Now you whine, "But our species can't survive if we don't breed!" No, we can survive fine. Why is it homosexuals and not infertile people? Humans have rather amazingly developed technology to the point where no actual breeding is required to give birth to offspring. So what happens if we are mostly homosexuals is that we can control birth rates. 
  • I think nature knows that. 
  • See. gay people are the next step in evolution. That's why so many homosexuals are so awesome. 
  • These awesome people will jump up hoppidy hop up to the top. Then they will ameliorate policies, and even more homosexuals will rule our world.