IN THE TWENTY FIRST CENTURY,
THE GENDER MINORITY GROUPS
WILL RISE TO BE THE MAJORITY GROUPS
This century will bring a particular sort of social change: one where the world turns over placing minority groups of long history at the top of society. Who are these minority? Two groups have evidently begun the march up to this metamorphosis. One is half of the whole population treated not even human for so long; the other is a much smaller group whose gender identities are peculier. They will rule the world.
Ladies first. Ever heard of the term 'alpha girl'? It was sort of a fad a few years ago. It indicated a girl or a woman who excelled in activities beyond a man. It indicated a girl or a woman was generally expected to be inferior to males, but there were a few exceptions so exceptional they deserved a whole nice cute phrase to themselves.
That phrase quietly crept into the shadows. People don't believe in 'alpha girl's anymore. Every girl is exceptional, and no girl is expected to be naturally inferior to men. Or at least people know that that should be the case. There is 'equal'.
But will it stop there? Men used to be the ruling species; they weren't 'equal', they were the only gender that ruled. So can't women gain that position? The qualities required for this century are those of the feminine sort; empathy, sensitivity, detailed manner, being subtle. It is what higher jobs of the new era require, them being more about investment, management, and social relationships. Of course, not all women possess these qualities and not all men don't, but generally speaking, this is what society thinks women have. At least, that's what people have started to think. Among 64,000 people surveyed in thirteen nations, two thirds feel the world would be a better place if men thought more like women. Women are wanted. They will be placed on the top, soon. Or else, they'll make they're own way there.
Then we have homosexuals. As was just mentioned, feminine qualities are desired in society today. Now, there are gay men who have these qualities. These are the rulers to come after women. There is more to this story for besides women-like traits, there is another thing the society currently needs. Less people. Earth is overflowing. Humans are using up everything. However, it seems like people aren't going to change their lifestyles for quite some time.
So what can be changed? The number of the pests on the planet. There need to be less people who breed. Homosexuals don't. They're what Earth wants more of instead of destructive heterosexuals. Evolution. More and more people will be born with the mutation. Eventually, mankind will evolve towards being homosexuals.
Now some may whine, "But our species can't survive if we don't breed!" No, we can survive fine. Why is it homosexuals and not infertile people? Humans have developed technology to the awe-striking point where no actual breeding is required to create offspring if there's the material. So if we are mostly homosexuals, we can control birth rates. Nature knows that.
Gay people are the next step in evolution. That's why so many homosexuals are what is currently viewed by people as 'awesome'. These 'awesome' people will jump up to the top. Then they will ameliorate policies, and even more homosexuals will rule our world.
Women will be the ruling gender of our world, and then gay people will be. It does seem a little radical for the current century. But think about what happened in the previous one. People went from being unable to communicate at distances more than a hundred meters away to seeing each others faces live while on opposite sides of the Earth. Technology turned over. Society will, too.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHonestly, I like your unique view towards what is going to happen to the world in the near future. However there are several doubts I would like to comment about.
ReplyDelete1. What is the basis of the logic that women are more fit in the society today? In many studies although being nice and calm and thoughtful might be suitable in the society often, but in high places, the very important factor is mainly being decisive and strong. For example, as a president, generally men look more stable and much more firm. Although this essay argues that empathy is important, you cannot argue against the fact that people on the top currently are extremely fast and mostly has the so called 'FEELING' in making decisions. There wasn't a female in history that was decisive enough to make Billionths of profit from the stock market or the bond market. So where is the logic that having maternal factors leads to high positions in society?
2. In the case of careers of the field that are not academic, the big importance is endurance and stamina, strength. A. Sports: the record of women's mostly do not excel that of men's B. Cooking: the top chefs of the world are men, since they have a higher capability of standing such physical burden. C. Music: yes, there are many famous female artists in this field, but the world classed conductors are all male...
3. Mankind has evolved to be homosexual...Well, I think this is a bit extreme. The theory of evolution involves a serious incident that threatens lives, leading to the natural selection theory. Second, homosexuality has always existed on the planet, Platonic Love:(this actually IS about being gay)/수동무 etc. Third, the problem of the exploding population is more about the increase of kids in the poor areas, and those places still are, rather, too active in breeding. Also the issues regarding homos in the developed regions, it is said that the side effects of environmental hormones lead to such happenings. Furthermore in the city, the problem is not about having too much babies, it's just that people are not dying at the age that they used to. So there is no way that you can state that it is the next level of evolution for the survival of our species.
Of course, I believe it is just to have women as part of the leading class, and that homosexual people should have the rights just the way straight people do. However, I believe it is too much of an assumption to allege how the society will turn out, especially in a EXTREME way like this.
Uh good point yeah
ReplyDeleteI don't really want to argue against it :)
Thanks for putting the effort in to write such an extensive comment
And by the way, when I was writing this I kept thinking
"How can I make this century go to the extreme?"
because I thought that's what centuries tend to do
decades decay, centuries go extreme, millennias just fly in a spaceship to some other dimension...
sth like that
so I just thought that the prediction should be extreme enough to make people of the current era angry
How do you think you would have reacted a century ago if sbd explained what life would be like in 2013?
A little bit like the skepticism and almost.. anger? betrayal? in your comment, no?
Well yeah sorry, I did kinda comment a bit too emotionally, I admit that lol;;BUT, I still think that the evidence backing up your points still lack a bit;; And yes maybe what you could really be the future. However, I don't think that what is just the same as saying that blacks will be able to vote in the 21st century back in the early 20th century. Cuz, that's about the rights itself and democracy, equality. What your essay is talking about mostly focuses on that democracy will perish, and women will be taking the high seats since they are superior, and that homosexual population also will rise up to the top class since they are more biologically advanced than heterosexuals.
ReplyDeleteI agree that women will get a better chance and that homosexuals will be able to roam freely, but I think the arguments you made are a bit extreme :)
yup :)
DeleteI think you are putting the minority on top... While it's true there are awesome girls, and awesome gays, it doesn't mean all girls or gays are superior to the other part of humanity, which also contains a lot of awesome 'people'. Anyways, I always like how your essay reminds me of how you speak... informative.
ReplyDeleteWell, history doesn't always function rationally.
DeleteWere men, the 'race' that dominated all women and homosexuals unconditionally in so many parts of the world for so many eons, all awesome?
I never stated they would rule because they are so much better then anybody else.
Society will evolve in ways so they are 'placed' at the top.
And I was trying to be overly dramatic anyway :)